A Single Article

Read it, comment, and share it with your friends

Disenchanted

Posted July 26 in Design.

A few days ago I realized the following: I am disenchanted with web design. I say this while I have been working on a redesign of my own, but I have a lot of reasons for feeling this way.

For one thing, I am not a designer. How have I been fooling everyone all along? The truth is that I have a very talented but woefully underpaid circus monkey working for me. I hide him in the closet when people visit. He’s the designer, and I am just the business savvy exploiteer.

I was kidding (honestly). My designs are not the kind of quality work that a circus monkey could produce. Still, that leaves you with no explanation as to how a non-designer manages to get recognized as one so often, even making it into the 9rules Design Community. I can offer one possible explanation though: I know more about CSS than, like, a lot of people, and I’m half decent at usability and accessibility too. Buy that? Good.

So on the topic…

When I started learning CSS, I was awed by the Zen Garden. My goal, which required a certain amount of skill I will never have, was to create a featured design. After 15 minutes passed without that goal materializing, I lowered my expectations and decided I would settle for an entry in Stylegala. While I was still learning basic CSS techniques, I would spend a lot of time visiting various design galleries. They were full of inspiration and I would look at every website thoroughly. After a while, however, as I learned more about usability/accessibility and I continued to explore the galleries, I realized something about a lot of the work being produced by CSS designers. Despite the inherent accessibility and simplicity of CSS based design, many designers were finding ways to make their sites inaccessible, ineffective, and difficult to use. CSS is a technology that provides amazing flexibility. It always bothered me to see websites featured across multiple design galleries with rigid, photoshop-to-css design and piss-poor usability.

Then I learned enough to spend my time actually making websites as opposed to gawking at them. I got involved in groups like WSG, and I also launched Liquid Designs as my quiet protest to the typical fare of all the galleries on the web. Since then I have been through a long learning process in my own work and in observing the work of others.

When I redesigned this site (christianmontoya.com) for the last CSS Reboot in May 2006, I was very much focused on design for design’s sake. I tried my best to make it usable (using light gray on soft black as opposed to bright white on black and a liquid layout to accomodate a range of viewport widths), but for the most part I was just concerned about making a hip looking set of graphics. I was pleased with the design when I finished it, but more importantly, I was done and I was able to spend the next few months just blogging. This transition to working on content rather than design was very important… as time passed, I saw ways in which my design was hurting my content. I realized that after the initial rush of people visiting just to see Domo-kun in vector glory, my design was worthless if it didn’t help my content. Form follows function.

And because my previous design at Liquid Designs was very much like this one, I learned this lesson twice. It was rather often that I received comments for both of my sites claiming that they were/are difficult to read, and for someone who aspires to be a top blogger, I take these comments seriously.

So seriously, that when I redesigned Liquid Designs, I put usability first. Black text on white, headers defined by a different font, clear lines marking sections, a liquid-elastic layout, and plain form buttons were requirements I placed on myself. I did this because I know that as much as I could pay someone for a fancy image to slap across the top of my layout, such a thing would be wasted on a site which is known and loved purely for the content it offers.

A good example of content-focused design is Stammy’s site. It is what more of the blogging world (and even the rest of the web) should be: lightweight, clean, and content-focused. KISS all the way.

But while the beating goes on, the design community still manages to amaze me. Take this entry over at cssimport.com for example. Just take it. Take it all in. Come back here when you are done and say it with me:

“Forget the galleries. Forget the mockups. Design is not about fancy graphics. Design is not about drop shadows, outer glows, or gradient overlays. Design is not about reflected logos, icons, or stickers. Design is not about sIFR, AJAX, or Flash. Design begins with content. Good design is not measured by fanboy approval. Good design is measured by traffic, search engine placement, and conversions. Good design does not make the designer famous. Good design makes the client rich. Good design does not hinder the user experience. Good design is accessible to all.”

(disclaimer: I love joshuaink.com, I really do, I just needed an example.)

Meta

Useful things

Related Articles

These just might ring a bell

Get a Trackback link

10 Comments

Responses to my article
  1. Rich July 26, 2006

    I have a draft saved in my WP admin panel on almost exactly this subject. How CSS galleries ignore the important things, like functionality and usability and just feature knockout designs.

    So you’re definitely not alone. But there are various projects (none of which I have a particularly big hand in, just spreading the word) in the works to try and shift the focus. The next “reboot” might just surprise you. ;)

  2. Elliott Back July 26, 2006

    I just redesigned my homepage (see “Elliott Back”) and my goal was not to increase the readability of the content (really, the list of blogs I’m in charge of) but to jazz up the presentation. Really, the site could be replaced by a Big.com styled list of links, but the way it is now is 1000 times prettier. Drop shadows: check. AJAX: check. Gradients: check. Glows: check. Icons: check. Anyway, you get the idea…

  3. Dean July 26, 2006

    A kick-ass design doesn’t guarantee you anything, but you do need to have something to stand out from the other 50 million blogs. Joshua Ink may not have great content (I don’t regularly read his blog) but I don’t see how you can knock him just because of a great design! Every time someone opens your site, you have a chance to ‘wow’ them just a little. You have a chance to persuade them to read just one more article or look around at some of the meta-content or subscribe to your feed.

    I’d argue that you’re getting yourself mixed up in that little ‘manifesto’ of yours. Design is about all those things: graphics, logos, icons, shadows and gradients. Design is measured by peer approval. Good content on the other hand is what’s measured by traffic and your ratings. A good design isn’t going to make your site instantly good, but it can make it better.

  4. Dean July 26, 2006

    PS: The usabillity of your comment boxes suck. The text cursor is black on a (nearly) black background.

  5. Patrick Beeson July 26, 2006

    Well stated!

    I too do not consider myself a designer — I have no formal graphic design background, that’s for sure — but I am trained as a journalist in addition to my skills as a Web developer.

    And content is what I preach to everyone requesting an elaborately designed section of the site I work for. Without content, there can be no design (or any reason to return).

  6. C Montoya July 27, 2006

    Dean: Only in Safari, because Safari does not allow A LOT of CSS to be applied to forms. If you would like a screenshot of how this looks in FF/IE/Opera, let me know.

  7. C Montoya July 27, 2006

    Elliot: You may have gone for design for design’s sake, but your site is not in any way difficult to use. As long as you can design a good looking site without throwing usability out the window, it’s all cool.

  8. Dean July 27, 2006

    Yeah, yeah. Okay, granted. Still, I’m sad it doesn’t work.

  9. Andy Brudtkuhl July 27, 2006

    Excellent commentary design in web development. I have also been feeling the same way over the last couple of months. I have thought about redesigning GetANewBrowser with the mentality that content is the traffic driver, not design. Granted, I love our design and it got us plenty of traffic in the beginning. But in the long run the content has been the driver. The best examples are the A-List bloggers. Look at Scoble’s site - he doesn’t even define a font in his style. I think it is time for a change in the design community. I’m not a designer though, so what do I know.

  10. karmatosed July 28, 2006

    Form and function balancing comes to mind. I am also very jaded with the majority of gallery sites as they so often turn out the same ole same ole. What impresses me is doing something different and working in the constraints of the form of the site - be it blog, corporate. What doesn’t impress me is just adding the same effects and design as 100 others. I often have been criticised myself for not following the trends and personally I always take that as a compliment rather than negative. If we don’t as designers take the format into count and just copy everyone else because it is ‘in’ then we are slowly going up our own back ends… mutter.

Leave a comment

Share your thoughts with the world

You can use Markdown, or you can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Please keep comments respectful and on topic.

This form is guarded by Akismet, so don't waste your time trying to submit spam. It won't work. Ever.





Stay on top of new updates at this site: Subscribe to the Feed!